Iconatomy

10 comments to Iconatomy

• nathalie

  September 17, 2011 at 9:26 am · Reply

  oh i love those. i want more more more !!

• wat

  September 18, 2011 at 5:50 pm · Reply

  THIS IS A MONSTROSITY!
  JAMES DEAN AND ROBERT PATTISON? SRSLY??

• heh

  September 19, 2011 at 4:07 am · Reply

  This. ^^^^

• Robin

  September 20, 2011 at 10:27 am · Reply

  Thirded.

  Pattison has no place here.

• Necoho

  September 21, 2011 at 2:49 pm · Reply

  First off, it’s Pattinson.

  Secondly and most importantly, this is about icons. Now I can understand why people wouldn’t consider Robert worthy of that status – mostly, I assume, because of his role in the Twilight trilogy. However, the word ‘icon’ in the context of this entry refers to its meaning of “A person or thing regarded as a representative symbol of something”.

  James Dean was the “rebel without a cause” model of his time’s youth. And while we cannot speak with hindsight as with the former, it must be admitted that Robert Pattinson is immensely popular among the youth of now.

• Libby

  December 3, 2011 at 8:16 pm · Reply

  Those are badass! I with I would have thought of it!

• Gore

  December 25, 2011 at 8:08 pm · Reply

  Myra Breckinridge was right!

• Cheesy

  March 2, 2012 at 2:36 am · Reply

  Forthed on the Patti fellow, he shouldn’t the there, his is by definition not an ICON.

  “A person or thing regarded as a representative symbol of something”.

  Patti represents what? A Vacuous Vessel. Then Yes.

• Cheesy

  March 2, 2012 at 2:44 am · Reply

  It would have been better to have joined them up with equal or near too awards winners, that would make a strange looking hybrids for some.

• Maeve

  March 11, 2012 at 9:05 pm · Reply

  Should have been James Franco instead of Robert Pattinson